Year 12 Probability: Conditional probability

Back to Probability tutorials

Conditional probability asks for the probability of one event given that another event has already happened. That condition changes the sample space.

Work through the sections in order, then try the linked Year 12 skill quizzes after each section.

Main formula

$P\left(A\right|B)=P(A\cap B)/P(B)$, provided $P\left(B\right)\ne 0$.

Worked example

What to check

• Identify the conditioning event clearly.
• Rewrite the sample space if needed.
• Use Venn diagrams or tables when the wording is dense.
• Decide whether independence is actually given or only assumed.

Worked example 2

Common mistakes

• Using the original sample space after the condition has changed it.
• Mixing up $P\left(A\right|B)$ and $P\left(B\right|A)$.
• Assuming events are independent when the question gives no reason to do so.

Revision focus

Probability work becomes far more reliable when you define the object of the question before calculating. Is the problem about ordered outcomes, unordered selections, a conditional event, a discrete random variable, or a continuous density? That decision controls the method. In many exam questions, the major error is not arithmetic. It is using a correct formula for the wrong kind of probability situation.

A second useful habit is to interpret the result immediately after it is found. Decide whether the answer is a count, a probability, an average outcome, or a spread measure. In continuous settings, remember that probabilities come from areas over intervals, not from single points. In discrete settings, remember that the total probability must still add to one. Those interpretation checks are often the fastest way to catch an error before it reaches the final line.

In probability, the final line should always answer the right event, not just display a calculation. After computing, read the question again and confirm that your sample space, condition, or random-variable interpretation still matches what was asked. That last comparison catches a surprising number of near-miss errors.